Health Science

Intelligent Genetically Modified Twins from China

The world’s first genetically edited babies named Lulu and Nana have been created by Chinese scientists using the Crispr/Cas9 gene editing tool. This opens up endless possibilities in the medical and agricultural fields but raises ethical questions of misuse too

In November 2018, a team of Chinese scientists created the world’s first genetically edited babies named Lulu and Nana, using the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing tool.

These twins were born with an altered DNA sequence that will make them resistant to HIV, smallpox, and cholera. This breakthrough in genetic engineering stirred up controversy and ethical debates worldwide.

However, beyond the alarming headlines, the question remains: how exactly did researchers manage to modify the genetic makeup of these twins and what are the implications of this technology?.

What is CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing?

Crispr/Cas9 is a revolutionary genetic engineering tool that enables precise and efficient editing of DNA sequences in living organisms.

It is a naturally occurring system that bacteria use to defend themselves from viruses by recognizing and cutting their DNA. Researchers have developed a way to harness the Crispr/Cas9 system and use it for targeted gene editing.

The process involves designing a guide RNA that matches the sequence to be modified, which is then paired with Cas9, a type of enzyme that cuts the DNA strand. This creates a double-strand break that can either be repaired using cells’ natural DNA repair mechanisms or replaced by a new piece of DNA supplied by researchers called a donor template.

The Creation of Lulu and Nana

The Chinese team led by Dr. He Jiankui used Crispr/Cas9 to target a gene called CCR5, which encodes for a protein that HIV uses to enter human cells.

By disrupting this gene, the hope was that the babies would be both immune to the virus and its potential transmission from their HIV-positive father. The team also targeted a gene associated with the smallpox virus and one associated with cholera. Through in vitro fertilization, scientists injected the edited embryos into a woman’s uterus, resulting in the birth of healthy twins.

The Controversy Surrounding Lulu and Nana

The announcement of the genetically edited twins sparked an immediate backlash from the scientific community, as well as the general public.

Related Article Brilliantly Engineered Twins Brought into the World in China Brilliantly Engineered Twins Brought into the World in China

Many experts and organizations voiced their concern over the ethical implications of creating genetically modified humans. The main worries include the uncontrolled spread of genetically modified traits, the potential for unintended consequences, and the fact that the technology is still in its early stages and not yet fully understood. Dr.

Jiankui faced significant criticism for his lack of transparency and failure to follow standard ethical procedures. He was later fired from his university, and the twins’ whereabouts remain unknown.

Future Implications of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing

While the creation of Lulu and Nana has raised significant ethical questions, the technology’s potential implications for modern medicine cannot be ignored.

CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing represents a potential solution to a wide range of genetic disorders such as cystic fibrosis, Huntington’s disease, and sickle cell anemia. Additionally, the method could enable the creation of more resilient crops that require far fewer chemical pesticides, revolutionizing agriculture in an era of climate change.

However, the technology’s possible misuse in the wrong hands, political, and societal implications hold not so bright a future.

Conclusion

China’s creation of the world’s first gene-edited babies has created a global debate on the ethics of genetically modifying humans.

While the scientific community concurs that CRISPR/Cas9 technology to edit genes has a lot of ethical, medical, and agricultural advantages, the question remains on the extent of its potential misuse. The controversial experiment has led scientists, governments, and policymakers to consider new ethical and regulatory guidelines for future research into this technology.

As technology advances, it’s important to balance the potential benefits with the ethical and moral concerns surrounding gene editing, especially as it begins to affect human life and the concept of natural selection.

Disclaimer: This article serves as general information and should not be considered medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional for personalized guidance. Individual circumstances may vary.
Also check Revolutionary idea from British scientists for effective weight loss Revolutionary idea from British scientists for effective weight loss Revolutionary Experiment Proves American Scientists Can Transcend A Brain Dead Man Using Two Pig Kidneys Revolutionary Experiment Proves American Scientists Can Transcend A Brain Dead Man Using Two Pig Kidneys Macular degeneration patient undergoes gene therapy experiment Macular degeneration patient undergoes gene therapy experiment The dirty little secret about plush toys The dirty little secret about plush toys The Right to know: National Bioethics Committee on child vaccination information availability The Right to know: National Bioethics Committee on child vaccination information availability The legality of using artificial fertilization techniques The legality of using artificial fertilization techniques What is the potential of ketamine as an antidepressant? What is the potential of ketamine as an antidepressant? Investigating Men’s Sexual Behaviors: Taboos and Tape Recordings Investigating Men’s Sexual Behaviors: Taboos and Tape Recordings Physical cycle IVF: A novel approach to fertilization Physical cycle IVF: A novel approach to fertilization Chimeras with a human brain? Science did that too! Chimeras with a human brain? Science did that too! The benefits of removing dairy from your diet The benefits of removing dairy from your diet Molecular Technology: A Game Changer in Life Sciences Molecular Technology: A Game Changer in Life Sciences Is Depression Preventable through Genetic Intervention? Is Depression Preventable through Genetic Intervention? Researchers Claim That We May Be Able to Live for 150 Years Thanks to Biotechnology Researchers Claim That We May Be Able to Live for 150 Years Thanks to Biotechnology Antibiotic Breakthrough: Powerful New Drug Effective Against Deadly Infections Antibiotic Breakthrough: Powerful New Drug Effective Against Deadly Infections Breaking News in IVF Research Breaking News in IVF Research Advances in Therapeutic Approaches to Partitioning Diseases Advances in Therapeutic Approaches to Partitioning Diseases Doctor fabricated HIV data to receive funding Doctor fabricated HIV data to receive funding Shockingly Odd Consequences of Wearing Rubber Bands on Your Wrist Shockingly Odd Consequences of Wearing Rubber Bands on Your Wrist Stereotaxis: A Game-Changer in Breast Biopsies Stereotaxis: A Game-Changer in Breast Biopsies The Hidden Hazards of Dark Chocolate The Hidden Hazards of Dark Chocolate Renal and Cardiac Protection with the Same Drug Renal and Cardiac Protection with the Same Drug Gene Editing Allows Scientists to Control Stem Cells Gene Editing Allows Scientists to Control Stem Cells Examining the ethical mindset of incarcerated individuals Examining the ethical mindset of incarcerated individuals Thirty-Two Years in Slumber: The Mystery of Waking Up Thirty-Two Years in Slumber: The Mystery of Waking Up Research shows possible benefits of coffee for Parkinson’s disease Research shows possible benefits of coffee for Parkinson’s disease Hope for longer life: Researchers discover brain protein Hope for longer life: Researchers discover brain protein Child eggs: What’s the best age to eat them Child eggs: What’s the best age to eat them Stem Cell Therapy: A Promising Cure for Type 1 Diabetes Stem Cell Therapy: A Promising Cure for Type 1 Diabetes Cybele: Outrage over Health Minister’s Silence on PD for IVF Cybele: Outrage over Health Minister’s Silence on PD for IVF
To top