Self-reported health information is widely used in research studies for various reasons, including data collection feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and convenience.

However, the reliability of self-reported health information has long been debated due to concerns about recall bias and social desirability bias. In this article, we will discuss the methods and strategies used to measure the reliability of self-reported health information.

What is reliability?

Reliability refers to the consistency of measurement over time, across different observers, and through different measurement methods. In other words, if a measurement tool is reliable, it should produce consistent results under similar conditions.

Types of reliability

There are several types of reliability, which are commonly used in research studies:.

Test-retest reliability

Test-retest reliability is the degree to which a measurement tool produces consistent results over time.

To assess test-retest reliability, the same measurement tool is administered to the same group of participants twice with a certain time interval in between. The results are then compared to see how much they vary. A high degree of similarity indicates good test-retest reliability.

Inter-rater reliability

Inter-rater reliability is the degree to which different observers or raters produce consistent results when using the same measurement tool.

To assess inter-rater reliability, multiple observers or raters are trained and then asked to use the same measurement tool to evaluate the same group of participants. The results are then compared to see how much they vary. A high degree of similarity indicates good inter-rater reliability.

Internal consistency reliability

Internal consistency reliability is the degree to which different items in a measurement tool are measuring the same construct.

To assess internal consistency reliability, different items measuring the same construct are administered to the same group of participants. The results are then analyzed to assess the degree of correlation between the items. A high degree of correlation indicates good internal consistency reliability.

Validity vs. reliability

It’s important to note that reliability is not the same as validity. Validity refers to the degree to which a measurement tool measures what it is intended to measure.

A measurement tool can be reliable but not valid if it consistently measures something other than the intended construct.

Measuring the reliability of self-reported health information

Self-reported health information can be used to measure a wide range of health-related constructs, including physical activity, diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, and chronic disease status.

To measure the reliability of self-reported health information, various methods and strategies can be used:.

Test-retest reliability

Test-retest reliability can be used to assess the consistency of self-reported health information over time.

For example, participants can be asked to complete a questionnaire about their physical activity levels at two different time points, such as two weeks apart. The results can then be compared to see how much they vary. A high degree of similarity indicates good test-retest reliability.

Inter-method reliability

Inter-method reliability can be used to compare self-reported health information with other measurement methods. For example, participants can be asked to wear an accelerometer to measure their physical activity levels for a certain period of time.

Related Article How accurate are our self-reported health assessments?

They can also be asked to complete a questionnaire about their physical activity levels during the same period. The results can then be compared to see how much they vary. A high degree of similarity indicates good inter-method reliability.

Inter-rater reliability

Inter-rater reliability can be used to assess the consistency of self-reported health information when different interviewers or researchers are involved.

For example, participants can be asked to complete a questionnaire about their smoking habits with two different interviewers. The results can then be compared to see how much they vary. A high degree of similarity indicates good inter-rater reliability.

Concurrent validity

Concurrent validity can be used to compare self-reported health information with other measurement methods that measure the same construct.

For example, participants can be asked to complete a questionnaire about their fruit and vegetable intake, and their blood samples can also be taken to measure their vitamin C levels. The results can then be compared to see how much they vary. A high degree of similarity indicates good concurrent validity.

Criterion validity

Criterion validity can be used to compare self-reported health information with a gold standard measurement method.

For example, participants can be asked to complete a questionnaire about their chronic disease status, and their medical records or diagnostic tests can also be used to determine their actual disease status. The results can then be compared to see how much they vary. A high degree of similarity indicates good criterion validity.

Limitations and considerations

Measuring the reliability of self-reported health information has certain limitations and considerations that need to be taken into account:.

Recall bias

Recall bias occurs when participants are asked to recall events or behaviors that happened in the past. Inaccuracies and inconsistencies may arise due to natural memory decay, selective memory, or purposeful omission.

To minimize recall bias, the timeframe of the events or behaviors should be as short as possible, and the questions should be as specific and detailed as possible.

Social desirability bias

Social desirability bias occurs when participants provide answers that they perceive to be socially acceptable or favorable rather than truthful or accurate.

In the case of health-related behaviors, participants may underreport behaviors that are considered unhealthy, such as smoking, and overreport behaviors that are considered healthy, such as physical activity. To minimize social desirability bias, the questions should be worded in a neutral and non-judgmental way, and the anonymity and confidentiality of the participants should be ensured.

Sample size and representativeness

The sample size and representativeness of the study sample are important factors that can affect the reliability of self-reported health information.

A larger sample size and a more diverse and representative sample can increase the reliability of the results by reducing the chance of random variation and selection bias.

Conclusion

The reliability of self-reported health information can be assessed using various methods and strategies, including test-retest reliability, inter-method reliability, inter-rater reliability, concurrent validity, and criterion validity.

However, certain limitations and considerations, such as recall bias, social desirability bias, sample size, and representativeness, need to be taken into account to ensure the reliability of the results.