It may sound like an absurd question, but in some places around the world, walking has been criminalized. Walking is a basic human right, and humans have been walking since the beginning of time.

However, due to various factors, walking has now become a hot topic of discussion, with some arguing for its criminalization, while others defend it as a fundamental right. In this article, we will explore all aspects of this issue and examine whether walking can be considered a criminal activity.

What is the status of walking around the world?

Walking, at its core, is a natural, healthy, and ecologically-friendly way to move around. Therefore, it’s essential to have the requisite infrastructure that promotes walking in communities and cities.

Unfortunately, in several countries, walking isn’t a viable option. There are various reasons for this.

The status of walking in various countries varies depending on a variety of factors. In some developing countries, there is limited infrastructure for walking, and pedestrians frequently share the road with vehicles.

In other countries, walking is less of a choice and more of a necessity due to their economic situation.

In Europe and North America, walking is more of a choice, and there is generally adequate infrastructure for pedestrians. Footpaths, cycle tracks, and bridges have been built to promote pedestrian safety.

However, even in these developed countries, there are areas where walking is unsafe, such as in the inner city. The high amount of crime, including street fighting, drug-trafficking, and mugging, makes walking an incredibly dangerous activity.

Arguments for criminalizing walking

Some people believe that walking should be criminalized in certain areas. They propose this for various reasons, including;.

1. Pedestrian safety

In areas with heavy traffic, pedestrians are at risk of being hit by vehicles. Furthermore, pedestrians are at risk of being attacked by wild animals or robbers.

Some lawmakers propose criminalizing walking in unsafe areas to promote the safety of pedestrians.

2. Noise pollution

Some people believe that walking in residential areas is noisy and disturbing to the inhabitants of homes. To reduce noise pollution, they argue that walking should be banned in these areas.

3. Environmental pollution

Walking doesn’t cause any pollution. However, when the number of pedestrians is high, some argue that walking can lead to considerable environmental pollution.

Supporters of criminalizing walking in these areas argue that promoting vehicles’ use is more environmentally friendly.

Arguments against criminalizing walking

Those who argue against criminalizing walking have their unique set of reasons. Below are some of the significant arguments against the criminalization of walking.

1. Public health

Walking is an essential and healthy way to maintain public health. It promotes the cardiovascular system, reduces diabetes and obesity, and improves overall well-being. Knowing this, criminalizing walking is a significant threat to public health.

2. Economic benefits

Walking has significant economic benefits. It not only reduces the cost of infrastructure, but it also boosts commerce in local communities. Through walking and cycling, people can discover local businesses and support them.

Criminalizing walking can lead to economic stagnation in businesses in local neighborhoods.

3. Environmental benefits

Walking has a positive effect on the environment. It doesn’t pollute the atmosphere and is an effective way to reduce carbon emissions. Encouraging walking and cycling can lead to a significant reduction in greenhouse gases that come from cars.

Conclusion

It’s clear that walking isn’t a criminal activity, and its criminalization is illogical. However, walking in some areas can be dangerous, and measures should be put in place to promote a safe walking environment.

In areas where there is no infrastructure for pedestrians, investments should be made in building pathways and cycling tracks to protect them. The benefits of walking efforts, both for human health and the environment, can’t be overstated. Therefore, criminalizing it would be a direct assault on public health and environmental conservation.